(Needs the title in the lead) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The name of the actress has been removed from the lead in amongst reverting the vandalism. I'm afraid I can't restore it without admin rights because the page is protected. Could an admin restore it? As an aside could pages that have only been vandalised by unregistered users not be left open to editing by registered users?--[[User:Opark 77|Opark 77]] 14:21, February 3, 2012 (UTC) |
The name of the actress has been removed from the lead in amongst reverting the vandalism. I'm afraid I can't restore it without admin rights because the page is protected. Could an admin restore it? As an aside could pages that have only been vandalised by unregistered users not be left open to editing by registered users?--[[User:Opark 77|Opark 77]] 14:21, February 3, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :At the moment the pages that have been locked have to stay admin-locked. It turns out the vandalism was a lot more serious than it first appeared, so I think this is for the best whilst it's being investigated more thoroughly.--[[User:Werthead|Werthead]] 18:59, February 3, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:59, 3 February 2012
The name of the actress has been removed from the lead in amongst reverting the vandalism. I'm afraid I can't restore it without admin rights because the page is protected. Could an admin restore it? As an aside could pages that have only been vandalised by unregistered users not be left open to editing by registered users?--Opark 77 14:21, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
- At the moment the pages that have been locked have to stay admin-locked. It turns out the vandalism was a lot more serious than it first appeared, so I think this is for the best whilst it's being investigated more thoroughly.--Werthead 18:59, February 3, 2012 (UTC)