No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | First and second, I believe that putting Hodor and Osha "on pause" is a good idea, because giving them filler material |
+ | First and second, I believe that putting Hodor and Osha "on pause" is a good idea, because giving them filler material would dilute the quality of their scenes. |
Third...I won't ask that at the panel. There really isn't some great controversy over not having "that character" at the end of Season 4, so long as that character shows up ''eventually''. |
Third...I won't ask that at the panel. There really isn't some great controversy over not having "that character" at the end of Season 4, so long as that character shows up ''eventually''. |
||
Fourth, what I ''would'' ask, which is far more controversial, is "how do you feel about the TV series removing the revelation about [[Tysha]] which in the books is what specifically motivated Tyrion to kill Tywin?" |
Fourth, what I ''would'' ask, which is far more controversial, is "how do you feel about the TV series removing the revelation about [[Tysha]] which in the books is what specifically motivated Tyrion to kill Tywin?" |
||
| − | |||
| − | FYI, it turns out that Natalia Tena actually has read all of the books, so she knows what we're talking about. |
||
Latest revision as of 16:50, 26 September 2014
First and second, I believe that putting Hodor and Osha "on pause" is a good idea, because giving them filler material would dilute the quality of their scenes.
Third...I won't ask that at the panel. There really isn't some great controversy over not having "that character" at the end of Season 4, so long as that character shows up eventually.
Fourth, what I would ask, which is far more controversial, is "how do you feel about the TV series removing the revelation about Tysha which in the books is what specifically motivated Tyrion to kill Tywin?"